Researchers from North Carolina State University used the PigSpread computer model to analyze the potential spread of African swine fever among swine farms in the southeastern U.S., revealing that between-farm movements were the primary transmission route. While existing control measures could reduce secondary infections by up to 79%, an outbreak could still persist and result in substantial costs. (Artist’s concept)
In a recent study conducted by North Carolina State University researchers, a computer model was employed to explore the potential spread of African swine fever (ASF) among pig farms in the southeastern U.S., as well as to assess the efficacy of current response strategies. The findings suggest that despite the beneficial impact of control measures, an outbreak could persist, leading to significant costs.
ASF is a highly contagious viral disease in pigs, with a mortality rate that can reach 100%. A further complication is that infected pigs may not display any symptoms prior to death, thereby increasing the chances of the virus spreading undetected. The financial implications of a potential ASF outbreak in the U.S. could amount to as much as $80 billion.
The researchers used an epidemiological model, called PigSpread, to look at the different ways a potential outbreak in the southeastern U.S. could unfold. The PigSpread model evaluates six transmission routes including between-farm swine movements, vehicle movements, and local spread, to model the dissemination of ASF.
The infection data used in this model came from the Morrison Swine Health Monitoring Project. Location, production type, capacity, between-farm swine movements, and vehicle movement data from 2,294 swine farms in the southeastern U.S. was collected from collaborating swine production companies and was also fed into the model.
The researchers simulated the course of infection both with and without control strategies, varying the starting point of the outbreak. Overall, they ran approximately 230,000 different simulations, with each simulation occurring over a 140-day time period. They then averaged the results.
Between-farm movements accounted for 71% of disease transmissions in the model, with local spread and vehicular transmission both contributing about 14% each.
“The main route of transmission is of course moving animals between farms, but vehicles and local spread are also important in an outbreak scenario,” says Gustavo Machado, assistant professor of population health and pathobiology at NC State and corresponding author of the work.
“Local spread refers to wildlife movements, sharing farm equipment, or visitors who may have contaminated footwear or clothing,” Machado says. “But one very important variable here is vehicular transmission. This dissemination route has never been studied at a large scale, but here it has shown to be pivotal in disease spread.”
The model also showed that control actions, specifically a combination of quarantine, depopulation, movement restrictions, contact tracing, and enhanced surveillance, did have an impact. In simulations where these actions were implemented, secondary infections were reduced by up to 79% on average within the 140-day time frame. Twenty-nine percent of the simulations where all control strategies were implemented saw no more affected farms within that time period.
“While these results are promising, they are still a bit optimistic,” Machado says. “The model shows that policies we have in place would have a positive effect on an outbreak overall, but we need to further investigate this scenario to determine what exactly is required to get it under control. And the epidemic will likely last longer than 140 days even with these interventions.”
Reference: “Estimating the effectiveness of control actions on African swine fever transmission in commercial swine populations in the United States” by Abagael L. Sykes, Jason A. Galvis, Kathleen C. O’Hara, Cesar Corzo and Gustavo Machado, 12 June 2023, Preventive Veterinary Medicine.
DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2023.105962
The work was supported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service under award AP22VSSP0000C004. The Morrison Swine Health Monitoring Project is a Swine Health Information Center (SHIC) funded project.
Researchers from North Carolina State University used the PigSpread computer model to analyze the potential spread of African swine fever among swine farms in the southeastern U.S., revealing that between-farm movements were the primary transmission route. While existing control measures could reduce secondary infections by up to 79%, an outbreak could still persist and result in substantial costs. (Artist’s concept)
In a recent study conducted by North Carolina State University researchers, a computer model was employed to explore the potential spread of African swine fever (ASF) among pig farms in the southeastern U.S., as well as to assess the efficacy of current response strategies. The findings suggest that despite the beneficial impact of control measures, an outbreak could persist, leading to significant costs.
ASF is a highly contagious viral disease in pigs, with a mortality rate that can reach 100%. A further complication is that infected pigs may not display any symptoms prior to death, thereby increasing the chances of the virus spreading undetected. The financial implications of a potential ASF outbreak in the U.S. could amount to as much as $80 billion.
The researchers used an epidemiological model, called PigSpread, to look at the different ways a potential outbreak in the southeastern U.S. could unfold. The PigSpread model evaluates six transmission routes including between-farm swine movements, vehicle movements, and local spread, to model the dissemination of ASF.
The infection data used in this model came from the Morrison Swine Health Monitoring Project. Location, production type, capacity, between-farm swine movements, and vehicle movement data from 2,294 swine farms in the southeastern U.S. was collected from collaborating swine production companies and was also fed into the model.
The researchers simulated the course of infection both with and without control strategies, varying the starting point of the outbreak. Overall, they ran approximately 230,000 different simulations, with each simulation occurring over a 140-day time period. They then averaged the results.
Between-farm movements accounted for 71% of disease transmissions in the model, with local spread and vehicular transmission both contributing about 14% each.
“The main route of transmission is of course moving animals between farms, but vehicles and local spread are also important in an outbreak scenario,” says Gustavo Machado, assistant professor of population health and pathobiology at NC State and corresponding author of the work.
“Local spread refers to wildlife movements, sharing farm equipment, or visitors who may have contaminated footwear or clothing,” Machado says. “But one very important variable here is vehicular transmission. This dissemination route has never been studied at a large scale, but here it has shown to be pivotal in disease spread.”
The model also showed that control actions, specifically a combination of quarantine, depopulation, movement restrictions, contact tracing, and enhanced surveillance, did have an impact. In simulations where these actions were implemented, secondary infections were reduced by up to 79% on average within the 140-day time frame. Twenty-nine percent of the simulations where all control strategies were implemented saw no more affected farms within that time period.
“While these results are promising, they are still a bit optimistic,” Machado says. “The model shows that policies we have in place would have a positive effect on an outbreak overall, but we need to further investigate this scenario to determine what exactly is required to get it under control. And the epidemic will likely last longer than 140 days even with these interventions.”
Reference: “Estimating the effectiveness of control actions on African swine fever transmission in commercial swine populations in the United States” by Abagael L. Sykes, Jason A. Galvis, Kathleen C. O’Hara, Cesar Corzo and Gustavo Machado, 12 June 2023, Preventive Veterinary Medicine.
DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2023.105962
The work was supported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service under award AP22VSSP0000C004. The Morrison Swine Health Monitoring Project is a Swine Health Information Center (SHIC) funded project.