Sapphire Rapids HBM2E CPUs Fall Behind EPYC 3D V-Cache CPUs In Leaked Benchmarks


A well-known blogger has shared perhaps the first performance number of Intel’s upcoming Xeon Platinum Sapphire Rapids processors with 60 cores and HBM2E cache.

Some of Intel’s customers already get PRQ versions (opens in new tab) of select 4th Generation Xeon Scalable Sapphire Rapids processors. Still, the launch of high-volume models has suffered a delay to late 2022, with a full-scale ramp now scheduled for 2023 as the company had to correct certain bugs in silicon and then re-qualify those CPUs with partners. Intel keeps specifications of its upcoming products under wraps. Since there are many Sapphire Rapids processors in the wild already, not only do we know some of their alleged specifications, but their performance numbers have surfaced ahead of launch.

YuuKi_AnS (opens in new tab), a prominent hardware leaker with a good track record and access to unreleased hardware, has laid his hands on Intel’s 60-core Xeon Platinum 8490H CPU and a 52-core Xeon Platinum 8472C processor, presumably equipped with 64GB of HBM2E cache. The hardware blogger not only disclosed the specifications of the said products but also published their benchmark result. All the information is proven by screenshots (see the gallery below), so everything looks somewhat credible, while there may be some bumps. Meanwhile, since we are dealing with pre-production hardware, take the results with a grain of salt.

Cores/Threads Cache L2+L3 Frequency TDP – PBP – MTP
Xeon Platinum 8472C* 52/112 112MB + 97.5MB 2.50 GHz – 3.80 GHz 350W – 420W – 764W
Xeon Platinum 8490H* 60/120 120MB + 112.5MB 1.90 GHz – 3.50 GHz 350W – 420W – 764W

*Specifications are unconfirmed.

Last spring, Intel only planned to release Sapphire Rapids CPUs with up to 56 cores, but now the company is testing 60-core Xeon Platinum 8490H processors running at 1.90 GHz – 3.50 GHz. Furthermore, the company looks to be testing 52-core Xeon Platinum 8472C CPUs with on-package 64GB of HBM2E memory and running at considerably higher 2.50 GHz – 3.80 GHz.

CPU-Z Single-Thread CPU-Z Multi-Thread
Xeon Platinum 8472C 542.5 31,954.3
Xeon Platinum 8490H 508 32,747.6

Due to higher frequency, Intel’s Xeon Platinum 8472C offers slightly higher single-thread performance than the company’s Xeon Platinum 8490H CPU in the CPU-Z 2.02.0 benchmark. Yet the 60-core model scores marginally higher in multi-threaded workloads.

While core count and frequencies affect performance in virtually all workloads, adding HBM2E memory (with a 1.22 TBps peak bandwidth) benefits select memory bandwidth-bound workloads, such as computational fluid dynamics and rendering.

Threads and Frequency V-Ray Score (K samples)
2x Xeon Platinum 8472C 224 @ 2.50 – 3.80 GHz 95,014
2x Xeon Platinum 8490H 240 @ 1.90 – 3.50 GHz 71,830
2x AMD EPYC 7773X 256 @ 2.20 – 3.50 GHz 102,843
2x AMD EPYC 7763 256 @ 2.45 – 3.50 GHz 109,248

It is precisely what we see in Chaos’s V-Ray 4.10.03 benchmark, which can take advantage of both many cores and higher per-core performance. 64GB of HBM2E memory plays a more significant role here, which is why the Xeon Platinum 8472C is about 32% faster when compared to its Xeon Platinum 8490H sibling.

Interestingly, AMD’s EPYC 7773X (Milan-X with 3D V-Cache) does not have any edge over the EPYC 7763 processor, which runs only a tad faster. Nonetheless, both already available CPUs are currently untouchable by Intel’s offerings that have yet to come to market.

One thing that YuuKi_AnS pointed out is that new BIOS versions tend to add performance to Intel’s Sapphire Rapids CPUs. So, assuming that there will be further microcode optimizations of these processors, production servers and workstations based on these CPUs will offer higher performance than current samples. But until those machines arrive, all we have left is to analyze results obtained on pre-production CPUs.




A well-known blogger has shared perhaps the first performance number of Intel’s upcoming Xeon Platinum Sapphire Rapids processors with 60 cores and HBM2E cache.

Some of Intel’s customers already get PRQ versions (opens in new tab) of select 4th Generation Xeon Scalable Sapphire Rapids processors. Still, the launch of high-volume models has suffered a delay to late 2022, with a full-scale ramp now scheduled for 2023 as the company had to correct certain bugs in silicon and then re-qualify those CPUs with partners. Intel keeps specifications of its upcoming products under wraps. Since there are many Sapphire Rapids processors in the wild already, not only do we know some of their alleged specifications, but their performance numbers have surfaced ahead of launch.

YuuKi_AnS (opens in new tab), a prominent hardware leaker with a good track record and access to unreleased hardware, has laid his hands on Intel’s 60-core Xeon Platinum 8490H CPU and a 52-core Xeon Platinum 8472C processor, presumably equipped with 64GB of HBM2E cache. The hardware blogger not only disclosed the specifications of the said products but also published their benchmark result. All the information is proven by screenshots (see the gallery below), so everything looks somewhat credible, while there may be some bumps. Meanwhile, since we are dealing with pre-production hardware, take the results with a grain of salt.

Cores/Threads Cache L2+L3 Frequency TDP – PBP – MTP
Xeon Platinum 8472C* 52/112 112MB + 97.5MB 2.50 GHz – 3.80 GHz 350W – 420W – 764W
Xeon Platinum 8490H* 60/120 120MB + 112.5MB 1.90 GHz – 3.50 GHz 350W – 420W – 764W

*Specifications are unconfirmed.

Last spring, Intel only planned to release Sapphire Rapids CPUs with up to 56 cores, but now the company is testing 60-core Xeon Platinum 8490H processors running at 1.90 GHz – 3.50 GHz. Furthermore, the company looks to be testing 52-core Xeon Platinum 8472C CPUs with on-package 64GB of HBM2E memory and running at considerably higher 2.50 GHz – 3.80 GHz.

CPU-Z Single-Thread CPU-Z Multi-Thread
Xeon Platinum 8472C 542.5 31,954.3
Xeon Platinum 8490H 508 32,747.6

Due to higher frequency, Intel’s Xeon Platinum 8472C offers slightly higher single-thread performance than the company’s Xeon Platinum 8490H CPU in the CPU-Z 2.02.0 benchmark. Yet the 60-core model scores marginally higher in multi-threaded workloads.

While core count and frequencies affect performance in virtually all workloads, adding HBM2E memory (with a 1.22 TBps peak bandwidth) benefits select memory bandwidth-bound workloads, such as computational fluid dynamics and rendering.

Threads and Frequency V-Ray Score (K samples)
2x Xeon Platinum 8472C 224 @ 2.50 – 3.80 GHz 95,014
2x Xeon Platinum 8490H 240 @ 1.90 – 3.50 GHz 71,830
2x AMD EPYC 7773X 256 @ 2.20 – 3.50 GHz 102,843
2x AMD EPYC 7763 256 @ 2.45 – 3.50 GHz 109,248

It is precisely what we see in Chaos’s V-Ray 4.10.03 benchmark, which can take advantage of both many cores and higher per-core performance. 64GB of HBM2E memory plays a more significant role here, which is why the Xeon Platinum 8472C is about 32% faster when compared to its Xeon Platinum 8490H sibling.

Interestingly, AMD’s EPYC 7773X (Milan-X with 3D V-Cache) does not have any edge over the EPYC 7763 processor, which runs only a tad faster. Nonetheless, both already available CPUs are currently untouchable by Intel’s offerings that have yet to come to market.

One thing that YuuKi_AnS pointed out is that new BIOS versions tend to add performance to Intel’s Sapphire Rapids CPUs. So, assuming that there will be further microcode optimizations of these processors, production servers and workstations based on these CPUs will offer higher performance than current samples. But until those machines arrive, all we have left is to analyze results obtained on pre-production CPUs.

FOLLOW US ON GOOGLE NEWS

Read original article here

Denial of responsibility! Techno Blender is an automatic aggregator of the all world’s media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials, please contact us by email – admin@technoblender.com. The content will be deleted within 24 hours.
BenchmarksCPUsEPYCFallHBM2ELeakedRapidsSapphireTechnoblenderTechnologyUpdatesVCache
Comments (0)
Add Comment