Techno Blender
Digitally Yours.

cancer survivor: SC refuses to grant stay on tax notices to egaming companies

0 32


The Supreme Court on Friday refused to stay the Directorate General of GST Intelligence’s (DGGI) tax notices to e-gaming companies, saying it will hear the matter on January 8.

The notices raised a demand of GST on the ‘buy in’ amount for each game and proceeds on the hypothesis that the staking of money in online games (whether of skill or chance) amounts to betting and gambling and that the ‘buy in’ constitutes as a transfer of goods as actionable claims, according to petitions challenging the notices.

Elevate Your Tech Prowess with High-Value Skill Courses

Offering College Course Website
IIM Kozhikode IIMK Senior Management Programme Visit
Indian School of Business ISB Product Management Visit
IIM Lucknow IIML Executive Programme in FinTech, Banking & Applied Risk Management Visit

The pleas were filed by the E-Gaming Federation and two of its members — Head Digital Works and Play Games 24×7 that face GST demand of Rs 6,497 crore and Rs 20,929 crore, respectively. They stated that there was no supply of an actionable claim by the online operator to the players and hence the levy of GST was “unsustainable”.

On Friday, additional solicitor general N Venkatraman told a bench led by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud that the petitions by the e-gaming companies have not been served on the government and the issue related to taxation on online gaming is a “serious and a sensitive” matter.

Senior counsel Harish Salve and counsel Badri Narayanan, appearing for the federation and the companies, said “the matter has all India significance and show cause notices worth several times the companies’ turnover are being issued. We want limited protection. Show cause proceedings have been going on for a few months, we are giving all the information, but they (the tax department) should hold their hands for three more weeks” till the SC hears the case.

The show cause notices were issued after the government clarified that online gaming, betting, and gambling will be levied 28% GST on the full face value from October 1. The government believes that some of these firms leveraged the lack of clarity on taxation of “game of chance” and “game of skill” before October 1 and there was a need to have a uniform 28% GST on the full value of bets placed on online gaming platforms. The government also amended the GST law making it mandatory for overseas online gaming companies to register in India from October 1.

Discover the stories of your interest


On September 5, the apex court stayed a Karnataka High Court order that quashed a Rs 21,000 crore GST notice issued to online gaming platform Gameskraft.Besides challenging the show cause notices issued to them, the petitioners have also challenged the constitutional validity of Section 9 read with Section 2(52) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 in so far as it imposed GST on “actionable claims” as being beyond the legislative competency of Parliament. They also questioned Rule 31A (3) of the CGST Rules, 2017 as being ultra vires the CGST Act, and thus being manifestly arbitrary, unreasonable and violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India, the petitions filed through counsel Charanya Lakshikumaran stated.

Stay on top of technology and startup news that matters. Subscribe to our daily newsletter for the latest and must-read tech news, delivered straight to your inbox.


The Supreme Court on Friday refused to stay the Directorate General of GST Intelligence’s (DGGI) tax notices to e-gaming companies, saying it will hear the matter on January 8.

The notices raised a demand of GST on the ‘buy in’ amount for each game and proceeds on the hypothesis that the staking of money in online games (whether of skill or chance) amounts to betting and gambling and that the ‘buy in’ constitutes as a transfer of goods as actionable claims, according to petitions challenging the notices.

Elevate Your Tech Prowess with High-Value Skill Courses

Offering College Course Website
IIM Kozhikode IIMK Senior Management Programme Visit
Indian School of Business ISB Product Management Visit
IIM Lucknow IIML Executive Programme in FinTech, Banking & Applied Risk Management Visit

The pleas were filed by the E-Gaming Federation and two of its members — Head Digital Works and Play Games 24×7 that face GST demand of Rs 6,497 crore and Rs 20,929 crore, respectively. They stated that there was no supply of an actionable claim by the online operator to the players and hence the levy of GST was “unsustainable”.

On Friday, additional solicitor general N Venkatraman told a bench led by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud that the petitions by the e-gaming companies have not been served on the government and the issue related to taxation on online gaming is a “serious and a sensitive” matter.

Senior counsel Harish Salve and counsel Badri Narayanan, appearing for the federation and the companies, said “the matter has all India significance and show cause notices worth several times the companies’ turnover are being issued. We want limited protection. Show cause proceedings have been going on for a few months, we are giving all the information, but they (the tax department) should hold their hands for three more weeks” till the SC hears the case.

The show cause notices were issued after the government clarified that online gaming, betting, and gambling will be levied 28% GST on the full face value from October 1. The government believes that some of these firms leveraged the lack of clarity on taxation of “game of chance” and “game of skill” before October 1 and there was a need to have a uniform 28% GST on the full value of bets placed on online gaming platforms. The government also amended the GST law making it mandatory for overseas online gaming companies to register in India from October 1.

Discover the stories of your interest


On September 5, the apex court stayed a Karnataka High Court order that quashed a Rs 21,000 crore GST notice issued to online gaming platform Gameskraft.Besides challenging the show cause notices issued to them, the petitioners have also challenged the constitutional validity of Section 9 read with Section 2(52) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 in so far as it imposed GST on “actionable claims” as being beyond the legislative competency of Parliament. They also questioned Rule 31A (3) of the CGST Rules, 2017 as being ultra vires the CGST Act, and thus being manifestly arbitrary, unreasonable and violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India, the petitions filed through counsel Charanya Lakshikumaran stated.

Stay on top of technology and startup news that matters. Subscribe to our daily newsletter for the latest and must-read tech news, delivered straight to your inbox.

FOLLOW US ON GOOGLE NEWS

Read original article here

Denial of responsibility! Techno Blender is an automatic aggregator of the all world’s media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials, please contact us by email – [email protected]. The content will be deleted within 24 hours.
Leave a comment