Apple fined $2 billion over Spotify’s EU antitrust complaint
The European Union has fined Apple $2 billion for breaking EU competition laws with its approach to music streaming. The tech giant is said to have broken the EU’s antitrust rules by favoring Apple Music over competitors like Spotify.
The European Commission’s statement says Apple prevented app developers from “fully informing iOS users about alternative and cheaper music subscription services outside of the app,” giving an unfair advantage to Apple’s own music platform.
According to the statement above, the Commission says Apple’s behavior over the last decade has led to “significantly higher prices for music streaming subscriptions.” As other streaming services that pursue monetization through Apple’s service are subjected to a 30% fee, Apple Music can afford to undercut its prices without losing as much of its profit.
The press release adds, “Today’s decision concludes that Apple’s anti-steering provisions amount to unfair trading conditions, in breach of Article 102(a) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (‘TFEU’). These anti-steering provisions are neither necessary nor proportionate for the protection of Apple’s commercial interests in relation to the App Store on Apple’s smart mobile devices and negatively affect the interests of iOS users, who cannot make informed and effective decisions on where and how to purchase music streaming subscriptions for use on their device.”
Apple’s perspective
Following the news, Apple responded with a statement giving a rundown of its side of the story and emphasizing Spotify’s growth thanks to the App Store.
The statement highlights Spotify’s success in the world of music streaming in an effort to showcase how the App Store ultimately benefits Spotify more than it hinders it. “Companies like Google, Amazon, Deezer, SoundCloud, and Apple compete for customers every day — but Spotify stands at the top.”
Apple says Spotify chooses not to offer subscriptions via in-app purchases on the App Store — ignoring the continued dispute over the 30% fee for subscriptions that has led companies like Spotify and Netflix to remove any payment options from the App Store.
Apple claims, “free isn’t enough for Spotify. They also want to rewrite the rules of the App Store — in a way that advantages them even more.”
Ultimately, Apple wants to be clear that there have been multiple attempts from the EU Commission to build a case, of which there has been “No evidence of consumer harm” and “No evidence of anti-competitive behavior.”
This is only one step in the public antagonism between Spotify and Apple with no official Spotify app on Apple’s Vision Pro, the tech giant’s latest and greatest spatial headset. Just this weekend, Spotify signed an open letter to Apple, claiming its side-loading workaround is “a mockery of the DMA”.
More from iMore
The European Union has fined Apple $2 billion for breaking EU competition laws with its approach to music streaming. The tech giant is said to have broken the EU’s antitrust rules by favoring Apple Music over competitors like Spotify.
The European Commission’s statement says Apple prevented app developers from “fully informing iOS users about alternative and cheaper music subscription services outside of the app,” giving an unfair advantage to Apple’s own music platform.
According to the statement above, the Commission says Apple’s behavior over the last decade has led to “significantly higher prices for music streaming subscriptions.” As other streaming services that pursue monetization through Apple’s service are subjected to a 30% fee, Apple Music can afford to undercut its prices without losing as much of its profit.
The press release adds, “Today’s decision concludes that Apple’s anti-steering provisions amount to unfair trading conditions, in breach of Article 102(a) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (‘TFEU’). These anti-steering provisions are neither necessary nor proportionate for the protection of Apple’s commercial interests in relation to the App Store on Apple’s smart mobile devices and negatively affect the interests of iOS users, who cannot make informed and effective decisions on where and how to purchase music streaming subscriptions for use on their device.”
Apple’s perspective
Following the news, Apple responded with a statement giving a rundown of its side of the story and emphasizing Spotify’s growth thanks to the App Store.
The statement highlights Spotify’s success in the world of music streaming in an effort to showcase how the App Store ultimately benefits Spotify more than it hinders it. “Companies like Google, Amazon, Deezer, SoundCloud, and Apple compete for customers every day — but Spotify stands at the top.”
Apple says Spotify chooses not to offer subscriptions via in-app purchases on the App Store — ignoring the continued dispute over the 30% fee for subscriptions that has led companies like Spotify and Netflix to remove any payment options from the App Store.
Apple claims, “free isn’t enough for Spotify. They also want to rewrite the rules of the App Store — in a way that advantages them even more.”
Ultimately, Apple wants to be clear that there have been multiple attempts from the EU Commission to build a case, of which there has been “No evidence of consumer harm” and “No evidence of anti-competitive behavior.”
This is only one step in the public antagonism between Spotify and Apple with no official Spotify app on Apple’s Vision Pro, the tech giant’s latest and greatest spatial headset. Just this weekend, Spotify signed an open letter to Apple, claiming its side-loading workaround is “a mockery of the DMA”.
More from iMore
Denial of responsibility! Techno Blender is an automatic aggregator of the all world’s media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials, please contact us by email – [email protected]. The content will be deleted within 24 hours.