Techno Blender
Digitally Yours.

qualcomm eu legal fees: Court says EU must pay a fraction of legal fees sought by Qualcomm

0 17


Europe’s second-highest court has said EU regulators should pay €785,857.54 ($851,634) of legal fees for Qualcomm, less than 10% of the €12 million sought by the US chipmaker after it won an appeal against an antitrust fine.

The Luxembourg-based General Court said the number of hours worked and hourly rates used in Qualcomm’s claim was “manifestly excessive”.

Elevate Your Tech Prowess with High-Value Skill Courses

Offering College Course Website
IIM Lucknow IIML Executive Programme in FinTech, Banking & Applied Risk Management Visit
Indian School of Business ISB Professional Certificate in Product Management Visit
IIT Delhi IITD Certificate Programme in Data Science & Machine Learning Visit

Qualcomm submitted its legal bill to the European Commission in 2022 after the General Court backed the US group’s fight against a €997 million EU antitrust fine issued in 2018 and ordered the regulator to pay Qualcomm’s legal costs.

The Commission, however, disputed the €12,041,755.80 sought by the company, saying the amount should be €405,315.

Qualcomm said its legal bill was based on the importance and complexity of the case and the quantity of work done by a team of 19.

Judges in a ruling dated February 29 posted on the court’s website dismissed the US company’s arguments, saying courts were concerned only with the total number of hours of work necessary for the legal proceedings, irrespective of the number of lawyers involved in the case.

Discover the stories of your interest


They said hourly rates were not presented in relation to specific, clearly identified tasks and that the substantial amount of research and analysis and adduced numerous documents before the court was not sufficient to substantiate the sums claimed or that the work relating to them was necessarily incurred. “The applicant’s request is insufficiently substantiated and manifestly excessive as regards both the amounts claimed and the numbers of hours and related hourly rates,” judges said.

The court set the total fee including expenses for law firm Quinn Emanuel at €754,190 and €31,667.54 for economic consultancy Compass Lexecon/FTI.

Judges rejected a request for €302,658.10 for legal services provided by law firm Cravath Swaine & Moore as these were for documents obtained in US proceedings and subsequently produced as evidence in the EU litigation.


Europe’s second-highest court has said EU regulators should pay €785,857.54 ($851,634) of legal fees for Qualcomm, less than 10% of the €12 million sought by the US chipmaker after it won an appeal against an antitrust fine.

The Luxembourg-based General Court said the number of hours worked and hourly rates used in Qualcomm’s claim was “manifestly excessive”.

Elevate Your Tech Prowess with High-Value Skill Courses

Offering College Course Website
IIM Lucknow IIML Executive Programme in FinTech, Banking & Applied Risk Management Visit
Indian School of Business ISB Professional Certificate in Product Management Visit
IIT Delhi IITD Certificate Programme in Data Science & Machine Learning Visit

Qualcomm submitted its legal bill to the European Commission in 2022 after the General Court backed the US group’s fight against a €997 million EU antitrust fine issued in 2018 and ordered the regulator to pay Qualcomm’s legal costs.

The Commission, however, disputed the €12,041,755.80 sought by the company, saying the amount should be €405,315.

Qualcomm said its legal bill was based on the importance and complexity of the case and the quantity of work done by a team of 19.

Judges in a ruling dated February 29 posted on the court’s website dismissed the US company’s arguments, saying courts were concerned only with the total number of hours of work necessary for the legal proceedings, irrespective of the number of lawyers involved in the case.

Discover the stories of your interest


They said hourly rates were not presented in relation to specific, clearly identified tasks and that the substantial amount of research and analysis and adduced numerous documents before the court was not sufficient to substantiate the sums claimed or that the work relating to them was necessarily incurred. “The applicant’s request is insufficiently substantiated and manifestly excessive as regards both the amounts claimed and the numbers of hours and related hourly rates,” judges said.

The court set the total fee including expenses for law firm Quinn Emanuel at €754,190 and €31,667.54 for economic consultancy Compass Lexecon/FTI.

Judges rejected a request for €302,658.10 for legal services provided by law firm Cravath Swaine & Moore as these were for documents obtained in US proceedings and subsequently produced as evidence in the EU litigation.

FOLLOW US ON GOOGLE NEWS

Read original article here

Denial of responsibility! Techno Blender is an automatic aggregator of the all world’s media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials, please contact us by email – [email protected]. The content will be deleted within 24 hours.
Leave a comment