Why Henry Cavill Losing Out on James Bond Is the Best Thing That Ever Happened to Him
It’s time for his fans to face facts. Henry Cavill‘s probably never going to be James Bond. I know, I know, he’s been hanging around the top contenders to replace Daniel Craig for years and years now. After all, he was runner-up to take on the part of 007 when Craig himself landed the gig for 2006’s Casino Royale. He only lost out at the time due to his youth and the fact he hadn’t quite become a human mountain yet.
Cavill’s made his love for Bond clear many times since, but with a new franchise reset imminent, ironically Cavill may now be too old and too well-known for the part, as a younger, fresher-faced Bond — much like Craig was at the time — would be beneficial for the series’ longevity. And, you know what, that’s fine. Although it must’ve been a huge blow for the up-and-coming actor at the time, losing out on playing James Bond is really the best thing that could’ve happened to Henry Cavill’s career.
The surprising way missing out on 007 improved Henry Cavill’s career
For whatever reason, Henry Cavill’s become known for the bad breaks he’s had to face in his career. He missed out on Bond, his Superman career was cut short. Heck, he was even hand-chosen by Twilight author Stephenie Meyer to become Edward Cullen, but producers still went with Robert Pattinson. But it’s really high time this narrative was dispelled: Cavill is actually one of the luckiest actors in the business. And it’s all thanks to Casino Royale kicking him to the curb.
Instead of becoming attached to one iconic character, being unshackled from Bond has allowed Cavill to dive into numerous legendary roles and IPs. Superman, Geralt of Rivia, Sherlock Holmes, and let’s not forget his upcoming Highlander remake and Warhammer 40K universe. Sure, Craig managed to strike gold and now has Benoit Blanc to his name as well, but there’s no way Cavill would’ve established himself as Hollywood’s go-to franchise figurehead if he had put on Jimmy B’s tux all those years ago.
Cavill’s latest projects make it abundantly clear that he hasn’t lost anything by missing out on Bond either. February’s Argylle sees him land the title role in a metafictional subversive spy thriller that makes 007’s adventures seem old-fashioned and staid by comparison. And then, in April, he’s set to lead Guy Ritchie’s next outing, The Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare, a film about the very first spies, the British SOE in World War Two.
Director Martin Campbell might’ve been way out of line when he body-shamed the young actor back in 2005, but in choosing Craig over Cavill he gave him the gift of a sustained and varied film and TV career that just keeps on taking unexpected turns. Who knows, maybe he will come back to Bond the long way around. If it does happen, though, it would only be because 007 needs him, not the other way around.
It’s time for his fans to face facts. Henry Cavill‘s probably never going to be James Bond. I know, I know, he’s been hanging around the top contenders to replace Daniel Craig for years and years now. After all, he was runner-up to take on the part of 007 when Craig himself landed the gig for 2006’s Casino Royale. He only lost out at the time due to his youth and the fact he hadn’t quite become a human mountain yet.
Cavill’s made his love for Bond clear many times since, but with a new franchise reset imminent, ironically Cavill may now be too old and too well-known for the part, as a younger, fresher-faced Bond — much like Craig was at the time — would be beneficial for the series’ longevity. And, you know what, that’s fine. Although it must’ve been a huge blow for the up-and-coming actor at the time, losing out on playing James Bond is really the best thing that could’ve happened to Henry Cavill’s career.
The surprising way missing out on 007 improved Henry Cavill’s career
For whatever reason, Henry Cavill’s become known for the bad breaks he’s had to face in his career. He missed out on Bond, his Superman career was cut short. Heck, he was even hand-chosen by Twilight author Stephenie Meyer to become Edward Cullen, but producers still went with Robert Pattinson. But it’s really high time this narrative was dispelled: Cavill is actually one of the luckiest actors in the business. And it’s all thanks to Casino Royale kicking him to the curb.
Instead of becoming attached to one iconic character, being unshackled from Bond has allowed Cavill to dive into numerous legendary roles and IPs. Superman, Geralt of Rivia, Sherlock Holmes, and let’s not forget his upcoming Highlander remake and Warhammer 40K universe. Sure, Craig managed to strike gold and now has Benoit Blanc to his name as well, but there’s no way Cavill would’ve established himself as Hollywood’s go-to franchise figurehead if he had put on Jimmy B’s tux all those years ago.
Cavill’s latest projects make it abundantly clear that he hasn’t lost anything by missing out on Bond either. February’s Argylle sees him land the title role in a metafictional subversive spy thriller that makes 007’s adventures seem old-fashioned and staid by comparison. And then, in April, he’s set to lead Guy Ritchie’s next outing, The Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare, a film about the very first spies, the British SOE in World War Two.
Director Martin Campbell might’ve been way out of line when he body-shamed the young actor back in 2005, but in choosing Craig over Cavill he gave him the gift of a sustained and varied film and TV career that just keeps on taking unexpected turns. Who knows, maybe he will come back to Bond the long way around. If it does happen, though, it would only be because 007 needs him, not the other way around.
Denial of responsibility! Techno Blender is an automatic aggregator of the all world’s media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials, please contact us by email – [email protected]. The content will be deleted within 24 hours.