It’s Time To Say Goodbye To The Merge Method in Pandas | by Avi Chawla | Oct, 2022
Why I stopped using the merge method in Pandas and why you should too
The merge()
method in Pandas is undoubtedly among the most frequently used methods by data scientists in their data science projects.
Derived from the idea of table joins in SQL and extended to joining tables in a pythonic environment, the method merges two Pandas DataFrames based on the matching values in one or more columns.
This is illustrated in the diagram below:
The intuitive nature of the merge()
method makes it ideal for Pandas users to join DataFrames.
However, when it comes to the run-time, there is a relatively better alternative available in Pandas that you should prefer over the merge()
method.
You can find the code for this article here.
Let’s explore 🚀!
Method 1: Using merge()
As discussed above, the traditional and the most commonplace way of merging DataFrames in Pandas is using the merge()
method.
As demonstrated in the code block above, the method accepts two DataFrames, df1
and df2
.
Further, we specify the kind of join we wish to perform using the how
argument ("left"
in the example above).
Lastly, we specify the columns to be considered for matching values from the first DataFrame (df1
) with the left_on
argument and that from the second DataFrame (df2
) using the right_on
argument.
Method 2: Using join()
The join() method is similar to the merge() method in Pandas in terms of its objective but with a few differences in the implementation.
- The
join()
method performs a lookup at the index ofdf2
anddf1
. However, themerge()
method is primarily used to join using entries in a column. - The
join()
method performs a left join by default. Whereas themerge()
method resorts to an inner join in its default behavior.
The code block below demonstrates the join()
method.
As specified above, the join()
method performs an index lookup to join two DataFrames. That is, rows corresponding to the same index values are merged.
Therefore, while using the join()
method, you should first set the column(s) you wish to execute join on as the index of the DataFrame and then call the join() method.
To evaluate the run-time performance of the merge()
method in Pandas, we shall compare it with the join()
method.
Specifically, we will create two dummy DataFrames and perform a join using both the methods — merge()
and join()
.
The implementation of this experiment is shown below:
- First, we set the values of the integers from
(-high, +high)
. We shall compare the performance of both the methods on different sizes of the DataFrame with the number of rows fromrows_list
and columns asn_columns
. Lastly, we shall run each experimentrepeat
times.
- The
create_df
method accepts a series of arguments and returns a random DataFrame.
- In the code below, we measure the run-time of the
merge()
method and thejoin()
method on the same DataFramedf1
anddf2
.
Note that to use the
join()
method, you should first set the column(s) as the index of the DataFrame.
Next, let’s look at the results.
- The blue line-plot depicts the run-time of the
merge()
method, and the yellow line-plot represents the run-time of thejoin()
method. - We vary the number of rows from 1 million to 10 Million and notice that the run-time of both methods is positively correlated with the number of rows.
- However, the
join()
method provides significant improvement in the run-time over the traditionalmerge()
method. - As the number of rows increases, so does the difference between the run-time of both methods. This indicates that you should always use the
join()
method to merge DataFrames, especially in the case of larger datasets.
To conclude, in this post, we compared the performance of the Pandas’ merge()
and join()
method on a dummy DataFrame.
Experimental results suggest that merging on the index column using the join()
method is efficient in terms of run-time over the merge()
method — providing a performance boost of up to 4 to 5 times.
You can find the code for this article here.
Thanks for reading!
Why I stopped using the merge method in Pandas and why you should too
The merge()
method in Pandas is undoubtedly among the most frequently used methods by data scientists in their data science projects.
Derived from the idea of table joins in SQL and extended to joining tables in a pythonic environment, the method merges two Pandas DataFrames based on the matching values in one or more columns.
This is illustrated in the diagram below:
The intuitive nature of the merge()
method makes it ideal for Pandas users to join DataFrames.
However, when it comes to the run-time, there is a relatively better alternative available in Pandas that you should prefer over the merge()
method.
You can find the code for this article here.
Let’s explore 🚀!
Method 1: Using merge()
As discussed above, the traditional and the most commonplace way of merging DataFrames in Pandas is using the merge()
method.
As demonstrated in the code block above, the method accepts two DataFrames, df1
and df2
.
Further, we specify the kind of join we wish to perform using the how
argument ("left"
in the example above).
Lastly, we specify the columns to be considered for matching values from the first DataFrame (df1
) with the left_on
argument and that from the second DataFrame (df2
) using the right_on
argument.
Method 2: Using join()
The join() method is similar to the merge() method in Pandas in terms of its objective but with a few differences in the implementation.
- The
join()
method performs a lookup at the index ofdf2
anddf1
. However, themerge()
method is primarily used to join using entries in a column. - The
join()
method performs a left join by default. Whereas themerge()
method resorts to an inner join in its default behavior.
The code block below demonstrates the join()
method.
As specified above, the join()
method performs an index lookup to join two DataFrames. That is, rows corresponding to the same index values are merged.
Therefore, while using the join()
method, you should first set the column(s) you wish to execute join on as the index of the DataFrame and then call the join() method.
To evaluate the run-time performance of the merge()
method in Pandas, we shall compare it with the join()
method.
Specifically, we will create two dummy DataFrames and perform a join using both the methods — merge()
and join()
.
The implementation of this experiment is shown below:
- First, we set the values of the integers from
(-high, +high)
. We shall compare the performance of both the methods on different sizes of the DataFrame with the number of rows fromrows_list
and columns asn_columns
. Lastly, we shall run each experimentrepeat
times.
- The
create_df
method accepts a series of arguments and returns a random DataFrame.
- In the code below, we measure the run-time of the
merge()
method and thejoin()
method on the same DataFramedf1
anddf2
.
Note that to use the
join()
method, you should first set the column(s) as the index of the DataFrame.
Next, let’s look at the results.
- The blue line-plot depicts the run-time of the
merge()
method, and the yellow line-plot represents the run-time of thejoin()
method. - We vary the number of rows from 1 million to 10 Million and notice that the run-time of both methods is positively correlated with the number of rows.
- However, the
join()
method provides significant improvement in the run-time over the traditionalmerge()
method. - As the number of rows increases, so does the difference between the run-time of both methods. This indicates that you should always use the
join()
method to merge DataFrames, especially in the case of larger datasets.
To conclude, in this post, we compared the performance of the Pandas’ merge()
and join()
method on a dummy DataFrame.
Experimental results suggest that merging on the index column using the join()
method is efficient in terms of run-time over the merge()
method — providing a performance boost of up to 4 to 5 times.
You can find the code for this article here.
Thanks for reading!