Debating Antivaccine Cranks Debases Science and Harms the Public
Of all the ways to discuss science, debating debunked antivaccine activists, historically speaking, is an awful idea. Having one moderated by a clueless contrarian, and buoyed by a loudmouthed billionaire, would be one surefire way to make it even worse.
That’s precisely the circus that vaccine scientist Peter Hotez wisely refused in mid-June, amid a storm of angry invective and even threats on his life.
Even without adding the unedifying spectacle of the world’s richest man, Elon Musk, most popular podcaster, Joe…